UK Fishing Rights

I'm afraid our fishing industry will be sold out to the EU yet again.
When we went into the Common Market, the governement of the day held to 200 miles or median lines as the territorial rights to any oil. But we gave away (shared) our fishing rights in these waters back to a 3 mile limit!
Oil is a finite resource, but it is the hands of a very few, very powerful companies. Fishing, on the other hand, is an infinite resource if managed properly, but it's power is divided amongst a myriad of small interests. But they represent an awful lot of local communities around our coasts, and a very large infrastructure with a correspondingly large labour force. But it counts for very little when weighed against the might of the oil lobby.
Now, having "shared" the fish in "our" waters with the rest of the EU, I can't see them readily giving it back to us! You try getting a pig's snout out of a trough once it is there!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I must be batty!

Image
  End of 2020 National Bat Monitoring Programme. (NBMP)   That’s another season done! The last of the NBMP surveys is the Waterways Survey in the first and second halves of August each year. This survey counts the number of Daubenton’s Bat passes, as heard on a bat detector, as one stands beside the water, for each of 10 four-minute periods along a kilometre of water, be it lake or stream or river. One of the characters of Daubenton’s Bats is that they feed by skimming the surface of water, picking off insects that are emerging from the water or just hovering over it. (When seen on an infra-red night-sight they look like ice skaters.) By counting the number of passes at each station along the bank one gets an idea of how many bats are feeding in the area. So year on year one builds up a picture of the population changes for this bat.     A typical section of the Tamar where I record. I do three sites for this survey; two on the River Tamar which separates Cor...
Read more

THERE WILL BE TEARS!

Image
       Poplar trees in France protected (belatedly) from Beavers. Wildlife conservation these days has moved away from the “reserves” mentality onto a broader picture of re-introductions and re-wilding. But this brings “nature” closer to a wider spectrum of the public. “Nature” is no longer confined to a “reserve”. It is out there in the wider countryside. One may meet Cranes, Water Voles, and Beavers amongst others.  “Coming to a woodland near you – Wolves!” But those Wolves require quite a large territory to maintain them, and that to be far enough away from farmed habitat not to be a nuisance to livestock farmers. The same would apply to Beavers. So alright; they are not “top predators”. They are vegetarians. But they are still going to be in competition for fodder with grazing livestock.   I’ve seen in France the trails into riverside crops of maize they make. And the breaking down of riverbanks, and diversion of streams. So while these re-intr...
Read more

What's In A Name

WHAT’S IN A NAME? I saw a beautiful little ringed plover the other day. It was beautiful; it was little; it was ringed; and I know it was a plover. But even another birder wouldn’t be sure what I saw. Because there is both a Ringed Plover and a Little Ringed Plover. But they would know there isn’t a Beautiful Little Ringed Plover.   There would have been that element of doubt if I’d left out any of those capitals.   Large White: Great Black-backed Gull: Smooth-stalked Meadow Grass: Small Copper: the list is endless. But isn’t it being elitist to expect the reader to know that cream-coloured courser is the name of a species, and not the description of a bird. If you know your butterflies or your grasses you recognise the names. But what if you are a newcomer, a beginner. I once watched an aspiring young botanist become completely frozen out of a group of botanical recorders who were all conversing in scientific names, completely oblivious to the person who hitherto had ...
Read more